The Law Office of Ryan Kent represents individuals in personal
injury and family law matters. We also represent individuals
and small businesses in business and corporate law, employment
and labor, insurance, real estate, and professional practices
including professional malpractice. In all these fields we
resolve our clients’ disputes, where possible, through negotiation
or mediation. Where the parties can't resolve the matter
without litigation, we prosecute or defend their rights zealously
in court or arbitration.
Personal Injury
Personal injury is a legal term for an injury to the body as opposed to an injury
to property. The term is most commonly used to refer to a type
of claim alleging that the claimant’s injury has been caused by
the negligence of another. The most common types of personal injury
claims are road traffic accidents, accidents at work, tripping
accidents, assault claims and accident caused by defective products.
If the negligence of another party can be proved, the injured party
may be entitled to monetary compensation from that party. The amount
of compensation for a personal injury will primarily depend on
the severity of the injury. Serious injuries (such as broken bones,
severed limbs, brain damage) that cause intense physical pain and
suffering will tend to receive the highest injury settlements.
No win no fee is the term used to describe the Contingency Fee Agreement (CFA)
between a law firm and their personal injury client. In a personal
injury claim, this is an agreement between the client and their
lawyer, which will enable the lawyer to take on a personal injury
case on the understanding that if there is no settlement or recovery
after trial, the client will not have to pay their lawyer’s fees
and costs. Thus, in a personal injury claim, there is absolutely
no up-front cost to you. Our fee is a percentage of your recovery
that we obtain for you. If there is no recovery, there is no fee.
It is a risk-free relationship.
For the last 18 years Ryan Kent has represented
hundreds of personal injury claimants. Perhaps you have been involved
in an auto accident and are worried about how you will pay the
ambulance and emergency room bills. Maybe you are worried about
how you will be able to afford the ongoing treatment you need.
Maybe you have been injured in a fall that you believe was the
result of a hazardous condition of property, but don’t know what
to do next. Whatever the cause of your injury or the nature of
your personal injury claim, we are here to help you through every
step of this difficult process. Our goals are to make sure you
receive the medical care you need and to maximize your financial
recovery.
Do not delay! The first few days after an accident
are the most critical in regards to arranging for appropriate medical
care and communicating with the insurance company. The decisions
you make now can have significant ramifications on the value of
your claim. Every day that passes you may be failing to take the
actions that you need to in order to maximize your recovery. Call
the Law Office of Ryan Kent right away.
Our results speak for themselves:
Raymond was window shopping along a sidewalk in
a shopping mall. He fell and broke his knee as a result of unexpectedly
stepping off the curb. The insurance company denied any liability,
claiming the accident was not their fault. We pointed out that
a nearby shopping mall had painted their sidewalk curbs white in
order to make the transition more visible to pedestrians and that
this simple and inexpensive precaution would have prevented Raymond’s
accident. The insurance company then settled for $90,000.
After Faina entered an intersection on a green
light, she was struck by a defendant who ran a red light. However,
the defendant claimed that she had entered the intersection on
a yellow light. We were able to locate a witness and obtain a statement
that showed the accident occurred while the light was green for
Faina. However, the insurance company still refused to accept liability,
arguing that the light could have turned green for Faina after
the defendant entered the intersection on a yellow light. We then
obtained the traffic signal timing records that conclusively established
the defendant entered the intersection on a red light. The insurance
company then settled Faina’s claim for whiplash injuries for $25,000.
Eleni was hit from behind at low speed. There
was minimal damage to her car. However, due to a previous injury
to her low back, Eleni suffered an injury to her lumbar disc in
the accident. The insurance company refused to acknowledge that
Eleni might have sustained a significant injury in such a minor
accident and refused to offer more than $7,500. We filed a lawsuit
and marshaled all of the medical evidence and demonstrated that
the injury to Eleni’s lumbar disc had to have occurred in the subject
accident. The insurance company settled for $75,000.
Joe was sideswiped at medium speed. He sustained
a whiplash injury to his neck and back. At first, the insurance
company refused to acknowledge the severity of his injury and made
a low-ball offer. After we filed a lawsuit and marshaled the medical
evidence, the insurance company became more reasonable and settled
for $60,000.
Paul hit his head against the window in an accident
with an uninsured motorist. We arranged for him to receive the
best medical care for his post-concussion syndrome. We assisted
him in presenting his loss of earnings claim. As a result of our
involvement, Paul’s insurance company settled his claim for its
policy limits of $100,000.
Family Law
The Law Office of Ryan Kent has handled numerous actions involving child custody
and support issues. Ryan Kent has the experience and insight that
allows him to identify the issues that will be important to the
court and the knowledge required to present the evidence needed
to make sure those issues are decided correctly. We truly care
about these cases and understand that lives are literally at stake.
We will fight aggressively to make sure your voice is heard. We
devote these cases the time and attention they deserve. At the
same time, we are extremely sensitive to the financial situation
of our clients and will tailor the litigation plan to fit the budget.
We offer sliding scale fees and payment plans for those in need.
Here are some representative outcomes:
Ryland contacted us after another attorney charged
him a lot of money and failed to protect his son from a drug-addict
mother. We counseled Ryland on the steps to take to demonstrate
to the court that he was a good father. For less money than the
other attorney had charged for no results, we obtained an order
of sole custody to Ryland, with no visitation for the mother until
she provided three clean drug tests.
The mother of Joel’s son was seeking a substantial
increase in child support. She submitted an income and expense
report in support of her request. We obtained copies of her bank
records and audited them. We pointed out that the living expenses
she claimed on her income and expense report were in excess of
her checks and withdrawals from the account. We pointed out that
there were no checks or withdrawals to support her claimed child
care expenses. As a result of our work, the Court refused to increase
the amount of support Joel was paying.
It is important to secure competent legal counsel
as early as possible in custody and support issues. There are steps
that need to be taken immediately to secure the desired outcome.
Do not delay! Call the Law Office of Ryan Kent right away.
Business Law
The Law Office of Ryan Kent has extensive experience handling all types of business
disputes, ranging from partnership formations and dissolution to
contract disputes with clients and vendors.
Again, our results speak for themselves:
A marketing and website development company approached
us to assist with collections on a $40,000 bill for services rendered
upgrading a point of sale website for a customer. The customer
claimed that our client had excessively overbilled and failed to
provide a working point of sale website. The customer refused to
negotiate and we were compelled to institute binding arbitration.
The customer filed a counterclaim for the alleged loss resulting
from the purportedly defective website. We identified the issues
that were central to the case, marshaled the documentary evidence
and witness testimony needed to prove our position on those issues,
and presented it all at the arbitration. Our client prevailed at
the arbitration and recovered all of their outstanding fees, plus
interest. In addition, they obtained an award of attorneys’ fees
that completely covered the costs of hiring us.
Jeff and Diane owned a construction company that
was retained to build a custom luxury home for an architect. When
the home was just about completed, the architect fired Jeff and
Diane, took over $100,000 of construction loan funds remaining
and completed the home – thereby avoiding paying Jeff and Diane
the money they were due under the construction contract. The architect
then sued Jeff and Diane for allegedly misappropriating construction
loan funds. Their two prior attorneys charged them significant
fees, but without any positive results. When Jeff and Diane came
to the Law Office of Ryan Kent, the architect was moving the court
for summary judgment. We quickly evaluated the situation and identified
the issues that were central to the outcome of the case. We researched
the law and investigated the facts. We then submitted a comprehensive
opposition to the architect’s motion for summary judgment that
explained what really happened for the first time. Within weeks
of the denial of his motion for summary judgment, the architect dismissed his case.
However, when it comes to business and the law,
the old adage “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure”
speaks the truth. Every time we consult with a new client about
a business dispute they are involved in we go over how the dispute
could have been avoided if the client had consulted with us earlier.
Seeking legal advice during the contract negations or business
formation or at the first sign of trouble in a business relationship
can result in the avoidance of costly and unnecessary litigation.
|